DinoDude65
Sinraptor
Posts : 55
Respect : 6
Join date : 2009-09-16
Age : 29
 |  Subject: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles  Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:19 pm | |
| I think that they should have stuck with Apatosaurus, instead of Brachiosaurus; made the Stegosaurus become sick instead of the Triceratops; and have the Maiasaura, Hadrosaurus, and Microceratops in it as well. Not sure if anyone else made this connection (you probably did), but it seems to me that the stampeding Hadrosaurus in the novel parallel the Gallimimus in the film. Also, they should have included the Procompsognathids as well. They added a cool Mesozoic touch to the novel  | |
|
Raging Raptor
Admin
Posts : 78
Respect : 11
Join date : 2009-09-01
Age : 28
Location : Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:50 pm | |
| I agree totally. The reasons they did what they did, is because, the dinosaurs in the novels weren't as "catchy" as Gallimimus. | |
|
raptors rule
Admin
Posts : 132
Respect : 0
Join date : 2009-09-06
Age : 26
Location : U.S.A in South N.J.
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:53 pm | |
| Yeah,thats the main reason they did it. | |
|
Clonehunter
Compsognathus
Posts : 34
Respect : 0
Join date : 2009-10-31
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:51 pm | |
| I actually didnt care much for the Hadrosaurs. And I also say Brach is better than Apato, but they could've used apatasaurus instead of Mamanchi. | |
|
raptors rule
Admin
Posts : 132
Respect : 0
Join date : 2009-09-06
Age : 26
Location : U.S.A in South N.J.
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:09 pm | |
| Niether did I,but some of it could of been better like you said mamanchi should've been apato but oh well. | |
|
Raging Raptor
Admin
Posts : 78
Respect : 11
Join date : 2009-09-01
Age : 28
Location : Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:06 pm | |
| Have you read the novels, rr? | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Mixed Up Dinosaur Roles | |
| |
|
